New Ontario law targets drunk drivers
A new civil law
that took effect in Ontario yesterday will mean that drivers
who repeatedly drink and drive will
risk losing their cars permanently. The legislation sets
a new national standard for keeping Ontario's roads and
families safe from repeat drinking and driving offenders.
The new law allows the civil courts, at the request of
the Attorney General, to impound and forfeit a vehicle
if the court finds that the vehicle was involved in, or
is likely to be involved in, a drinking and driving offense,
and the vehicle is owned or driven by a person whose driver's
license has been suspended for a drinking and driving offense
two or more times in the preceding ten years. Forfeited
vehicles will go to public auction, and victims of the
activity which resulted in the forfeiture may apply for
compensation from the proceeds of sale. The civil court
will also have the power to release a vehicle from impound
if the registered owner of the vehicle agrees to certain
court-imposed terms and conditions, including fitting the
vehicle with an ignition interlock device, or having the
registered owner agree that the person whose actions resulted
in the forfeiture application would not drive the vehicle.
This protects the interests of responsible vehicle owners
who do, or have done, all they can to ensure that the vehicle
is not being driven, or will not be driven in the future,
by the person who engaged in unlawful vehicular activities.
The new law applies to automobiles, motorcycles, motor-assisted
bicycles and snowmobiles. "Ontario takes impaired
driving very seriously," said Attorney General Chris
Bentley. "Repeat drinking drivers who aren't getting
the message now run the risk of having the courts take
their vehicles away forever." Ontario's civil forfeiture
law already allowed for the forfeiture of vehicles used
for dangerous driving behaviour, such as street racing.
The new amendments to the Civil Remedies Act, included
in the Safer Roads for a Safer Ontario Act 2007, set a
new standard for road safety by targeting vehicles used
by repeat drinking and driving offenders.
Honda Civic and Ford F-Series top January sales
The Honda Civic doubled its sales in January 2008 over the
same period in 2007 and retained its status as Canada's top-selling
car, while the Ford F-Series pickup remained at the top of
truck sales last month, according to figures released by
industry analyst Dennis DesRosiers. "Needless to say,
Honda is sending a strong statement into the market that
they want the Civic to remain the best-selling passenger
car in Canada," DesRosiers said. "Second, GM places
three vehicles into the top ten passenger cars and four vehicles
into the top ten light trucks. Seven best selling products
is a position that GM has not been in for a lengthy period.
We have always said that in this industry, you get yourself
into trouble and out of trouble with product, product and
product. GM certainly understands this equation." DesRosiers
also noted that the market for small, entry-level vehicles
grew by 17.1 per cent in January, "which is clear evidence
that the consumer 'gets it' when it comes to environmental
issues," and that large pickup trucks were down 6.9
per cent, which he suggests could be an early sign of the
U.S. housing correction migrating into Canada, as "it
is the tradesmen who have backed out of the pickup truck
market in the U.S. and this may also be happening in Canada." The
top ten best-selling cars in Canada in January 2008, in order,
were the Honda Civic, Chevrolet Cobalt, Mazda3, Pontiac G5,
Toyota Corolla, Toyota Yaris, Pontiac G6, Honda Accord, Ford
Focus and Toyota Camry. The top ten best-selling light trucks
in Canada in January 2008, in order, were the Ford F-Series,
Dodge Caravan, GMC Sierra, Dodge Ram, Chevrolet Silverado,
Ford Escape, Honda CR-V, Chevrolet Uplander, Ford Ranger,
and Pontiac Montana SV6.
Volvo to build 15 millionth car today
Volvo will build its 15 millionth car today, a C70 convertible
that will leave the factory in Uddevalla, Sweden, 81 years
after the company produced its very first car on April 14,
1927. Volvo produced only 297 vehicles in its first year,
and through a global economic depression and the Second World
War, took 23 years to build its first 100,000 cars. Today,
that number corresponds to about three months of production.
Never a high-volume manufacturer, Volvo decided early in
its history that the brand name should signify quality and
safety. The company was the first to market a three-point
safety belt as standard equipment in 1959, and the first
with an environmentally-friendly three-way catalytic converter
with Lambdasond in 1976. The 15 millionth car, like the very
first one, will carry an "iron symbol" as its brand
identification on its radiator grille.
Daughter ordered to pay Dad $3 million in dealership buy/sell
dispute
Judge, jury penalize daughter for competing dealerships.The
Macomb (MI) Daily reports that a jury ordered the daughter
of the founder of the now defunct Jerome Duncan Ford dealership
to pay her father slightly more than $3 million, mainly for
opening three competing auto dealerships.The jury reached
a verdict in the nearly two-week long civil trial that pitted
Richard Duncan against his daughter, Gail, and her husband.
The pair operated Jerome Duncan over its last five years
before filing for bankruptcy in 2005, and opened three other
dealerships. Despite the award, the attorney for Gail Duncan
said he was somewhat pleased with the verdict because the
jury and the judge rejected several claims by Richard Duncan
regarding alleged pilfering of money and mismanagement at
the business. The jury of seven men and one woman told Gail
Duncan to pay $3 million for violating a non-compete clause
that she signed in a contract with her father in 1993 when
she took over majority control of Jerome Duncan. In the early
2000s, as president of the dealership she bought two Mazda
dealerships - one across the street from Jerome Duncan and
a former Mel Farr Hyundai/Kia dealership. The dealership
went bankrupt after Ford Credit discovered the dealership
was out-of-trust by $5.4 million. The entire award is against
Gail Duncan as the jury released her husband from any claim.
The bulk of the award was for violating the 1993 written
contract, along with the small amount for shareholder oppression.
|